Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You also owe me a thank you, because I was the one who framed the question.
Beyond the cheap personal shots, which I have moved beyond, I must admit that I do not see how these people in general can give advice to clients. They seem not to be able to start with explaining the basics.
A client doesn't get "It's a section 237 action, duh." You have to explain. Is it me?
|
Actually, in Spooky's case its more like he said "its a section 237 action, Red beats Green and Delano demurred " then when questioned on the correlation between Delano and the 237 action he said "I will type more slowly. Bc red beats green and red is reddeer than green" when what he shoudl have said is that"It is a Section 237 action because of the concurrence of the fact that Delano demurred and Red beats green. Without Delano demurring, red beating green would not arise to a 237 action (even though Delano resides in a different jurisdiction) because the Delano correlation to the 237 action is X. "
I don't actually think Spooky understood why there was a correlation between Delano demurring and there being a 237 action, just that there was some correlation he didn't understand. Which I understood by the time he said "I will type more slowly". I just dont think he knew himself. '
Which is why Spooky only got into Case Western and not Yale
