LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 220
0 members and 220 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2005, 12:39 PM   #2647
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
OK, I thought I understood this

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Why is it unreasonable to have a playoff game for determining which team gets into the post season, but not bothering (and instead relying on tiebreakers) when both teams are in, and it's just a question of who gets which seed?
I just think they should be consistent. Either you have a better record than a team, when tied, based on h2h records or you don't. Why look at it differently based on whether both teams have a shot at making the playoffs?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
A playoff game between the Red Sox and Yankees today would be a fiasco. They would start some regulars, and probably bring in the reserves pretty quickly, especially if one team got to a decent lead.
Isn't that exactly what would have happened if Cleveland, Boston and New York ended up with the same record?

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.