LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 186
0 members and 186 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-07-2005, 05:16 PM   #2267
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Our whole countrys legal system is based on the idea that there is a universal moral code and there is no moral relativism. It was clearly illegal for the colonies to declare independence from England. To justify it Jefferson did not say, well it may be illegal but we are going to declare independence anyway because it is in our interest to do so. Jefferson said that there is a higher law, that the creator gives all men rights, and if a government violates those rights (violates gods law, or the universal moral code) then people have the legal right, under the Creators laws, to declare themselves independent of those laws.

The whole idea of Justice assumes there is no moral relativism. If you argue in equity you are saying that something may be illegal but it is still OK. Then you are saying that although something you are arguing is not in line with the law, but is in line with a higher law. The concept of Justice (where Justice is different from legal) implies a higher absolute law.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.