Forums

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Are you retarded? There is nothing wrong with my math. If you ever competed in any athletic event you might be able to fathom that victory or defeat is not predicated on some rational analysis of what times should be. I had someone, who shall remain nameless, who posts on this board, admit to me, off board today, that I could probably have spotted them 400 metres on that same day and taken them down. another 400 metres ain't that much. I hate a lethal kick, something you probably don't understand.

I can cite instances where I have made up 20 plus minutes over ten miles on someone in a 13 mile run. On 99 out of 100 days that never would have happened because I am not normally 2 minutes a mile faster than this person, but shit happens in the heat of competition.

I will just keep responding to this so that you have a chance to brag about what a big fucking running stud you are on the internet, but you're still full of shit. You're suggesting that a person who can run a certain speed over three miles can't run a little faster over much shorter distances. Look at your (imaginary) times for the (imaginary) races you've run in. You can maintain a faster pace over a shorter distance if you must. That's how the human body works, even when it's some imaginary human body or the imaginary ex-wife of that imaginary person on the internet.

Any person who can run a 26:00 or so 5K can run a 4:00 half mile. No exceptions. People don't have some maximum speed that they can't exceed, but which they can maintain for 25 minutes.

You would know this if you were actually a runner and not just making up times from stuff that you have read on the internet.