LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 217
0 members and 217 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2005, 04:11 PM   #4377
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Bring it on Dimwits!

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Question: has any court held that partial birth abortion is unconstitutional in itself? As opposed to a holding that the statutes are either vague or overbroad (or both)?

And didn't casey uphold a parental consent provision, with a judicial bypass? Why is more needed?
I assume you mean has the outlawing of partial-birth abortion been held constitutional (or, conversely, that partial-birth abortion is protected by the constitution).

I don't think so. I think when the statutes have been struck down it is for vagueness/overbroadness, as you state.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.