LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 986
0 members and 986 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-23-2003, 08:45 AM   #251
andViolins
(Moderator) oHIo
 
andViolins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: there
Posts: 1,049
Billy Goats Gruff

Quote:
Originally posted by ms. naughty diplomat
it is back up now. what exactly is the safety concern here? are they living next to the roadways?

or is it that they just want to outlaw homelessness?
Cincinnati is always trying new and wacky stuff. There was a law struck down not long ago that attempted to ban individuals from reentering part of the City if convicted of a crime while in the area (and they did not live there). I know I am not explaining it well, but the goal was to (I believe) try to stop gang members or other groups from congregating together.

As for the homeless, I would think its a backhanded way of trying to clear them out without directly going after them. To claim that it is for THEIR safety [no really, that car was skidding right towards you!] seems awful thin to me. Not that living under a bridge would be my ultimate Barbi dreamhouse.

aV
andViolins is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.