LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 164
0 members and 164 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-02-2005, 11:28 AM   #4525
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
More predictions

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Of what benefit is it to hide the existence of interrogation prisons other than to avoid international scrutiny? This isn't covert ops, which are, understandably, covert. Once you've caught them and are interrogating them all but the information gleaned can be public without serious threat to intelligence gathering efforts.

But maybe what you're saying is that torture is justified in these circumstances.
the article points to one reason- the location could make a friendly nation an increased terror target.

the CIA's job is to gather information. the very way that is done is always slimy. Acts like prohibiting the use of criminals as informants, building walls, all the "reforms" were well-reasoned. They made "sense" within our rosy view of what America is. They also fucked up our ability to gather information.

What the CIA does should disgust and frighten you, and you shouldn't know about it.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.