LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 226
0 members and 226 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-08-2005, 03:01 PM   #154
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Vote no on Proposition 73

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Yes, but unlike certain activist judges, the Founders did not see any mystical penumbras emanating from their work.
From the Federalist No. 43:

Quote:
At first view, it might seem not to square with the republican theory, to suppose, either that a majority have not the right, or that a minority will have the force, to subvert a government; and consequently, that the federal interposition can never be required, but when it would be improper. But theoretic reasoning, in this as in most other cases, must be qualified by the lessons of practice.
"But theoretic reasoning...must be qualified by the lessons of practice." This is only one quote of many. But I think it proves the point adequately.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.