LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 200
0 members and 200 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Thread: Meh.
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2005, 12:35 PM   #4560
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Match.com

Quote:
Originally posted by Sparklehorse
It seems hard to believe this could be true, given that this strategy, particularly of hiring hot people to send out on dates, can't in any way be cost-effective. I could believe spam emails with fake profiles and maybe hiring someone to correspond for a few days while the subscription hopefully gets renewed but even that seems dubious.
Why not? The article says they'd hire someone to go out on 100 dates in a month (I think). How much would that cost vs. the benefit of re-upping 100 (or even 60) subscriptions at $30/month for a full year? Ten percent? Plus, I'm sure they only pay the "dates" if they actually succeed in getting the "sucker," I mean, client re-signed.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.