LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 259
0 members and 259 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Thread: Meh.
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2005, 01:08 PM   #4567
Sparklehorse
Registered User
 
Sparklehorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,713
Match.com

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Why not? The article says they'd hire someone to go out on 100 dates in a month (I think). How much would that cost vs. the benefit of re-upping 100 (or even 60) subscriptions at $30/month for a full year? Ten percent? Plus, I'm sure they only pay the "dates" if they actually succeed in getting the "sucker," I mean, client re-signed.

TM
Caveat: I haven't made any attempt to calculate this before I made my assertion. I have a real hearing to prepare for tomorrow.

That said, how much do you think the person going out on 100 dates in a month gets paid?

When I tried online dating, I subscribed to Match.com for 3 months and didn't renew. (I didn't really find good matches for me, FWIW). If I were on the fence about whether or not to renew and I sudddenly heard from a hot guy and we're emailing but haven't met yet, I might renew for some short period on the hopes of this developing. If I had already reached the point of a date with said hot guy, I would probably let it lapse. If the date went nowhere, you can still go back. If you go out again (and maybe again), I would start to think I don't need new people to juggle in.

If it's true, I guess maybe it could be geared towards a man who wants many dates versus a spinster looking for a relationship. If that's the case, should the suit also have a gender discrimination component?
__________________
delicious strawberry death!
Sparklehorse is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.