LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 223
0 members and 223 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2005, 05:29 PM   #725
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob


You don't like the fact that I gave you Faulk's name because it destroys your pet theory (based upon Ann Coulter) that no Not Commie was harmed by McCarthyism.
You got it wrong. The quote I gave from Ann Coulter was that no one has come up a with a person that was falsly accused by McCarthy. I never used the term McCarthysm and would never use that term.


Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob Oh, and your little Nazi analogy? Before his Wheeling speech, your hero McCarthy was best known as the apologist for and defender of the SS troops sentenced to death for their role in the massacre of US POWs at Malmedy during the Battle of the Bulge.
Why would I care what McCarthy said about Nazi's? How is that relevent? I never said McCarthy was a perfect man or that he was even a hero - that was stuff other people on the board attributed to me.

I just said that if he didn't falsly accuse anyone of anything, then his communist searches were not all that much of a problem. At least not the terrible transgrssion of justice that Hollywood has portrayed it to be.

Of course your focus on McCarthy and the Nazis allowed you to avoid answering my questions about racists and free speech which just convinces me that you are only concerned about free speech and association when it comes to communists but not to racists. Which in the end means you are not really concerned about free speech.

Last edited by Spanky; 11-21-2005 at 05:33 PM..
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.