LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,386
0 members and 1,386 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2006, 01:19 AM   #2682
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,282
Tort Reform!

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
So you are saying that states like Texas that don't have MICRA need it. So Sexual Harassment Panda arguments do not apply to non-MICRA states.

And you still didn't answer the question: if MICRA is doing such a good job of keeping litigation costs down why are malpratice rates so high in California and why have so many insurance companys in California disontinued providing medical insurance?
The Texas legislature passed HB 4 and the voters in Texas voted for Proposition 12 in 2003. (YAY! TEXAS!!!! ARE YOU WATCHING THIS GAME???? HOLY SHIT!) We have tort reform. The non-profit insurance company dropped it's rates automatically by 11 percent. The for-profit insurance companies raised their rates in 2004.

I suspect that the shareholders are much more interested in making money than providing medical malpractice insurance that is affordable.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.