LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,423
0 members and 1,423 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2006, 01:17 AM   #3676
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
InaniTy

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man

Your first assumption is wrong -- at least according to the oldest, technical, standard definition of blasphemy.

As Gattigap said -- you and Ty are using the term in different ways but you aren't admiting it. I think you know that.
As Ty is using the term -- and it is no secret -- his statements are not contradictory.
It is like you guys are on another planet. Why does it matter what me and Ty think the definition of blasphemy is? Why are you so focused on the word blasphemy when the important word is "offense". Ty said that he did not understand why Christians would consider this stuff offensive or blasphemous. And then he said he never said that Christians should not find it offensive. You throw the concept blasphemy completely out of the equation and the statement is still contradictory. Am I wrong?

Last edited by Spanky; 02-11-2006 at 02:12 AM..
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.