Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Every position you take does has negative consequences. Balt seems to get angry when these obvious consequences of liberal positions are exposed.
|
I think Balt is angry because your definition of liberal looks ONLY to the negative consequence.
Am I in favor of letting child molesters run free? According to you, I am, because I favor the exclusionary rule. Thus, a liberal is a supporter of child moleters
By that logic, a conservative is someone who believes that the Fourth Amendment has no application, that police should be allowed to enter any home in America or search any person anytime they want, and that obtaining confessions through torture is a legitimate law enforcement technique. Right? Isn't that the "obvious consequence" of rejecting the exclusionary rule, when you have no alternative in place?
