LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 228
0 members and 228 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-01-2006, 05:31 PM   #2440
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If that's all you can say, then you really have nothing to argue. Israel should stop weapons from coming in. But it shouldn't bomb, and it shouldn't destroy any civlian infrastructure (like the roads and bridges and airports through which the weapons come).

It also shouldn't invade or occupy.

Sorry to rule out diplomacy. If you think that is a viable option for Israel to use in dealing with Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah, please do tell.





By "existential threat" I don't mean conquest. I mean a threat to fundamental infrastructure, or the ability to threaten destruction that disrupts Israel's ability to function.

In 5 years, Hezbollah went from a few hundred rockets to many thousands, including very sophisticated, long-range rockets and cruise missles. Plus the ability to mount a fierce defense to an Israeli ground attack. In five more years -- even without nukes -- what will they build up?
2. to all of that.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.