Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I didn't say just a few bombs. I did say tactical nukes, as I think that if we use nukes, and I think that should be on the table here, they should be used judiciously. As for other types of bombs, I would go with this part of my earlier post:
"and as much of their military apparatus as bombing can take out".
We don't necessarily need to limit that to a few or pinpoint accuracy, although I do think some measure of accuracy would be needed to take out Ahmadinejad and the mullahs, but I would be willling to roll the dice on Israeli intelligence pinpointing where he would be for some speech, maybe in front of their parliament, with enough lead time to let us do what we need to.
|
Spanky -- since you are sane, and since you apparently need something to talk about, maybe you could comment on this. Do you advocate nuking Iran? Do you think that we have a realistic chance of targetting and eliminating Iran's nuclear capabilities and programs with a quick set of bombing raids? Do you think we could pull off another invasion?
Put more simply -- as I asked before --- do we have a military option in Iran?
Quote:
|
I am not advocating putting soldiers in Iran. Yet.
|
Good. Because we would need to depend entirely on the Coalition of the Willing and I'm not sure Costa Rica and Bermuda can spare enough troops.
