Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
The licking thing is also worse because it is an affirmative act. I might not be bothered by my fiance's failure to physically remove the stripper from his lap, . . . .
|
So the "but I didn't kiss back" defense has some currency? Or the "I just lay there and let him have his way with me" response is acceptable? Those strippers, as we all know, cling like fly-paper, though.
I can see the intimacy distinction, but not the passive/active one. If he had his pants on during the lap dance, there's a protective barrier (well, protective in a teen-idiot sense, or metaphysical), but tongue on skin just doesn't have that.
Anyway, what happened to the "what happened at the bachelor party stays at the bachelor party" rule? Em is ruining it for everyone!!
