Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Sort of, yes, but isn't the convention based on that we bred one group of animals for one thing and the other for another? And per RT's post doesnt the breeding of dogs for companionship/non-food purposes go back quite a ways?
Maybe primitive man sensed that dogs had an intellect that could be exploited for man's benefit, as opposed to cows, whcih were appeared solely exploitable for food (or sex, in the case of Hank;s ancestors)
Eitherwhichway, seems there is sort of rhyme or reason.
|
If I ate your dog, what would be the penalty?
TM
