Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Funny. I read the statute (for the second time, as it happens, having been accused by other people with a similar lack of basic reading comprehension of violating it) and I didn't see any prohibition on fantasizing about time travel.
Where's my pudding?
|
Not being a prosecutor, I will make the admittedly amatuerish assertion that it seems to me to turn on what is a "threat". Given that her general behaviour in re the President, in any other context, could likely be considered stalking, and given the nature of her remark, fantasy notwithstanding, and my understanding of the intent of the statute, I am not sure its quite as far fetched as you assert by your typically dismissively conclusory post would suggest.
As for your pudding comment, I would have been interested in whether your lawyer could have used the pudding defense if you had the seen the wrong side of that statute, but, you should thank RT that you didn't have to test it.....it doesn't seem to hold water, npi, to me.
Does
www.waybackmachine.com cache this board?
ETA: THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT SITE. Does anyone know the site that keeps historical caches of the whole of the interwebs????
