LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 181
0 members and 181 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-10-2006, 02:51 PM   #2962
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
More Voodoo

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I would suggest that proves my point. If a theory is only valid at the extremes, then it is not a valid theory.
Except the CBO study shows it is valid in the middle as well. What CBO showed was that we are on the uphill portion of the curve such that reducing taxes reduces revenue.

Sure, you can say the curve is lumpy or has multiple maxima, but there's even less support for that. Is it parabolic? No. Does it have a single maximum? Perhaps.

Club--your problem is that you think that t* (the rate obtaining maximum tax revenue) is somewhere below current rates.

Wonk--your problem is that you're trying to trash a very simplisitic theory that never purported to prove much of anything beyond a general principle on the ground that it is simplistic and fails to prove anything beyond a general principle. It's like saying supply and demand curves are an invalid theory because supply and demand have more determinants than price alone.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.