LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 108
0 members and 108 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2006, 02:32 PM   #3098
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Clinton bought time during which North Korea stopped enriching plutonium.
There is about a 1% chance this statement is true. I highly doubt it is the case that they stopped during that period and then, magically, started again after Bush takes over. But I don't want to argue this with you because we will go round and round and none of us really has a good handle on the facts.

The policy had good intentions, but it, like many of Clinton's foreign policy decisions, was merely a short-term, bandaid approach to a very serious problem. See Spanky's post. Trying to make deals with psychotic dictators is a no-win proposition, because they don't live up to their end of the agreement.

That said, there is no good solution to the problem of nuclear proliferation. It is going to happen, the speed at which it is going happen, like all developments in technology, is going to quicken, and there is little we can do about it directly.

In my mind, we have 2 options, both of which should be pursued simultanously. We need to develop a truly effective missle defense system. We have a start, although a dissappointing start given the amount of $ we have sunk into it, but I think a reasonably effective system is possible in the medium term.

We also need to encourage the spread of democracy, so that once a country obtains the technology, and they will if they are seeking it, the weapons are in the hands of hopefully rational people that value life above all else.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.