10-14-2006, 11:07 PM
|
#3137
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Since Spanky says that CRS reports are good authority, this summary from one repeats what I've been saying:
- North Korea ended the eight-year freeze on its nuclear program in late 2002, expelling international inspectors and restarting plutonium production facilities. Before then, the CIA estimated that North Korea might have enough plutonium (Pu) for 1 or 2 weapons. Since then, North Korea may have reprocessed the 8000 spent fuel rods previously under seal at Yongbyon, yielding enough Pu for 6 or 8 weapons. In 2005, North Korea announced it had nuclear weapons and was building more. It restarted construction on two larger reactors, and shut down its small reactor, possibly to extract plutonium.
Now you post a link to something that says that what I've said is incorrect.
|
is it fair for me to link to the stuff from 2000 I already posted? and how come people can ignore the questions I keep asking?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
