Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
That's a good question. My sense is that his administration has been paralyzed because different factions have prevented any one policy from going forward. Also, there don't seem to be any good military options.
|
Kristol, from the latest Weekly Standard:
Quote:
|
The difference between the Bush administration and its Democratic critics now amounts to six-party talks or two-party talks with North Korea--as if talking would stop Kim Jong Il. It turns on direct or indirect negotiations with Ahmadinejad--as if he were willing to negotiate away his nuclear program. With the exception of Bush's commendable steadfastness in Iraq--combined, how ever, with debilitating stubbornness on troop levels and strategy--and his support for Israel, Bush's foreign policy is now Clintonian in its combination of weakness and wishful thinking.
|
