Forums

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by bilmore
Ummmm, crack . . . No, wait . . .

You were serious? You don't know of whom I'd be speaking?

I'd not go into the origins of the problem - the whole Carter, Clinton, Albright thing - that's unresponsive to the issue of actions taken currently to actively and intentionally undercut our chosen executive's choice of actions.

No, I'd probably speak of how Kim is a megalomaniac who is best fed and encouraged when Kerry, who is outraged that Bush tries to go it alone in the ME (a moronic assertion in its own right) is also, simultaneously, outraged that Bush WON'T go it alone in NorKor now. Naked partisan play that hurts our efforts to make the world safer, for the sake of the KosKidz votes.

Or by pronouncements by ex-presidents Carter and Clinton, both so eager to shed their own rightful blame that they're willing to blow through traditions of ex-prez silence and publicly scorn Bush for the same issue and thus encourage, again, the bad-hair-day nutjob.

And, need I name all the DemPols who chimed in on those exact same stoopid arguments? No, I think not.

Like I said - you already knew what I was going to say.

you really don't want to open this can of worms. Ty's arguments here were so twisted they were almost vomit inducing.