| 
				
				"Some" thanks
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by bilmore I love how both sides always feel they can justify any quote by attributing it to "some" R's, or "some" D's, or "some" critics, or "some" hydrocephalics.  I'm sure "some" R's and "some" D's actively worship kumquats, but I'd still like to see names attached when "some" journalists quote their anti-rutabega views.
 
 And, when the story contains lines such as these, I begin - just begin, mind you - to think that maybe I'm not seeing factual reporting, but some crappy partisan editorializing instead:
 
 People killed trees for this shyte.   Amazing.
 |  I wouldn't pay for the Washington Post, but to blame them for acquiescing to the Administration's frequent insistence on providing information only on background is only half-right.
				__________________“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
 
 |