LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 138
0 members and 138 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2006, 02:22 PM   #4317
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Who could be against 65%?

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, of course not. I think we can assess teachers and reward those who do a good job the same way we assess and reward middle managers, whose performance is just as hard to quantify.

Teachers in dangerous, lousy school districts should get a special form of hazardous duty pay, and a different incentive system which allows them to make bonuses at lower goals, since that's the reality of the situation. The market demands we pay top dollar to those people, and they deserve it. We should allot our tax dollars in that direction above all else, since that's the real engine of our future prosperity, and would go far further toward social parity the Democrats seem to want than their idiot do-gooder programs which blow 70% of every dollar on administration costs for fattened bureaucrats.
But education is generally funded by property taxes, so how do we pay teachers in what will generally be more impoverished areas more than we pay those in richer areas?
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.