LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 227
0 members and 227 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-03-2006, 04:17 PM   #4876
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
NYT modus operandi

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I see your point.

You are against publicizing classified information, especially if the NY Times does it.

But you are in favor of publicizing classified information -- like, a how-to guide to building an atomic bomb, in convenient Arabic -- if the NY Times is against it.
Have you had your coffe yet? Don't be so obtuse. He never said publicizing this was a good thing. I am sure Slave supports the fact that they have taken it down. He, and the guy he quoted, are just saying that the fact that Saddam had information that can't be posted on the internet shows that he was a threat. Even if he didn't have the materials to make a bomb, he could sell that information to someone who did have the materials.

It is not that difficult a concept.

Sorry Slave - I should have let you respond to that but I just couldn't help myself.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.