LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 115
0 members and 115 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-02-2007, 03:38 PM   #18
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If ("if") government policies are being used to make the rich richer (e.g., extending copyright) rather than improving the lot of the middle class (e.g., education), that's something that's relevant to me. I'm not sure why looking at these things in the aggregate is dishonest. CEO pay (e.g.) doesn't magically happen. If CEOs are taking in increased share of the pie, it's because the various restraints on their conduct have been weakened.
No no no. It's because of those restraints that they get away with what they do. By example, the tax code protects the rich in endless ways.

Nobdoy's ever tried to let the market decide because CEOs don't want that. They'd rather lobby the govt to do their bidding.

There is no magic regulatory fix. A person who wants to will always get around the rules. In this case, he'll also pay to ensure loopholes allow it.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.