Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Check your facts cowboy. You were the first to mention his name. I just critisized the entire blog posting you linked to.
|
Actually, I believe you mentioned his name first in this little screed:
- Well that is the last time I ever check out a link you post. Why did you think this post had any credibility (or think it was it was something people should look at, or that it in any way supported the assertion that Unions help schools) before it contained any actual evidence? What possible value could this link have without the supporting evidence? Why waste anyone's time with it? I keep thinking that at some point you might link to something that is credible, relevant or at least partially coherent. You are like Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown. Not only was it a Blog, but a Blog whose posters are less analytical and rational than most idiots who usually post to Blogs. However, I did like Kleimans summary of the general content of Blogs:
Because you suggested that the post had no credibility, I then told you who Kleiman was.
I will admit to setting you up by linking to a blogger with impeccable academic credentials, suspecting that you would pay no attention to who he was and dismiss him out of hand. You obliged.
