Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
You apparently still don't read your damn posts. Those "other questions" remained mostly in your head.
The bolded question was the first of the TWO questions you asked.
Ty's post (and mine) directly addressed that first question you asked. You then said -- "So what, that's not what I asked. Everyone knows that." Well, bullshit.
Your second question was actually several folded into one, with likely different answers for each country. It is possible to tease out the implications, but that's not what you said.
S_A_M
P.S. I bet I can give you Obama's answer to the "should we just wait until the terrorists attack us again" part of your question. "No."
|
Dude, sorry if my post confused you but now that we've cleared that all up, the fact remains that Obama and some other candidates have not shown that they have a real command of what is happening in other countries. I think this is a very fair statement to make about Obama. It may also apply to other candidates but right now, I am making the statement about Obama. And I am right about it. Deal with it. And BTW, you know better than to post fluff like "we should be nice to our allies" and suggest that's an acceptable level of detail regarding foreign policy. Forget what you think my post said earlier. This fluff is just that -- fluff. It does not show he has an understanding of existing tensions and why. Foreign policy is not his strongest point (or if it is, he hasn't exactly shown it to be). If he was perfect, he'd be a shoo-in.