LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 94
0 members and 94 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-26-2008, 03:16 PM   #2295
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
"A bunch of fucking bond traders!"

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
More recently, he said: "Under Bush I in the final years he and the Demcratic Congress cut discretionary spending more than Clinton did when Clinton and the Dem controlled congress." I'm just curious. This strikes me as something that could be true, although it's not what I would have believed. So I asked for a cite. And perhaps it is true, but the page he cited doesn't show this. Either way, it doesn't change what we were arguing about earlier.
It was Fringy that originally cited that page, not me. I cited the page on the document showing Federal outlays, and then she pointed out the page on discretionary spending in the same document. And I just transcribed the numbers from the page Fringy cited (Twice). So go back to Fringeys original cite, and tell me which numbers I transcribed incorrectly.

I think it is table 8.8 that she referred to on page 157.

Last edited by Spanky; 02-26-2008 at 03:26 PM..
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 PM.