Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Try this:
08-1839 USA v. Farinella, Charles criminal 03/12/2009 Opinion POSNER
If not, go to homepage and opinions, then find this case in list of this week's opinions.
Anyway, I guess it's a bit easier to give the prosecutor a "talking to" for inflaming the passions of the jury when that's not the sole basis for reversal.
|
I know criminal law has its own standards, but this decision seems wacky.
He found there was no showing consumers were misled? Seriously? they got the crap for cheap because it was soon not sellable by the manufacturer. then they post date it? What is the purpose of the date?
