LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 158
0 members and 158 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-13-2009, 04:10 PM   #2042
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: Maybe ever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) View Post
Posner mentions the possibility of a civil claim by the manufacturer. But the manufacturer appears to have known at least that they would be sold at the dollar store. I'm not sure how new labels would hurt the sales at the local Piggly--I'm kind of envisioning a self-stick label applied by the dollar store, not an actual replaced label of the whole thing.
the reason it is cheaper is that it was suppose to come with a label that says the manufacturer doesn't believe it is good anymore. that way, people who buy into the date can tell themselves it makes sense to pay $5 (at a grocery) for a bottle instead of $1. The guy could have posted a sticker saying "expiration dates don't matter. He didn't. He posted a sticker that implies they matter. in fact, that he bothered to put new stickers on shows that they matter very much to consumers. I assume he covered the old date with the new sticker, no?

Say if you were convinced it made sense to buy high octane premium gas. It would be one thing if I sell regular and put a sign saying "Don't buy premium. It doesn't add anything, it just cost more."

That's not what the guy did. He put a sign up calling the regular premium.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.