Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
I don't think it was a stupid question. "The donor of semen provided to a licensed physican and surgeon for use in artificial insemination of a woman other than the donor's wife is treated in law as if he were not the natural father of a child thereby conceived." Cal. Fam. Code s 7613(b). But I think California law uses the term "natural mother" to describe the woman who carried the pregnancy, not who supplied the egg. I wonder if Rowe can have her relinquishment of parental rights declared void as against public policy, because the strong presumption in California is against anything that results in a person having one parent instead of two (outside of adoption, where the worse alternative is zero parents).
|
If she was just a surrogate, maybe she doesn't even want the kids? Whoever gets them, I hope they get a chance to live a somewhat normal kids life, all things considered.
