Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Manfred
That regulatory scheme was caused by two related things: the near-collapse of the student loan industry in the 1980's, and the rise of diploma mills, often catering to minority and/or low-income students. Reforms across the country led to stricter attendance policies and other safeguards for almost all vocational schools. For some schools, the regulatory costs were too much to bear and there was a lot of consolidation of private, for-profit vocational schools, especially in California.
Having said that, if the school back East has sensible administrators, they'll produce her admissions documents where she initialed a stack of disclosure forms which promised career assistance, not a career.
|
I agree with what you say, and I've defended these cases successfully on behalf of California schools. But according to what Ty posted, the suit is about the school's failure to provide the promised career assistance, not the career.
