LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 217
0 members and 217 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-29-2009, 12:09 PM   #4491
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: the longest time it took for a sex act to come back and haunt someone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
Ummm...what the hell are you talking about? Rich people shit on our tax laws and use Swiss banks (who pocket the fees) to do it and when we figure out how to catch them and get our money back (even give these people amnesty to pay what they owe without being prosecuted), you're pissed off about it? You are a strange dude.

TM
The problem is, we didn't figure out how to catch them. We weren't successful in locating and examining specific transactions on our own to determine who here was hiding money abroad and then send reasonable, narrowly-tailored requests to the Swiss citing the basis for release of finite records on individual suspected tax cheats. Instead, we took the lazy approach and said "Give us all records on all Americans with X amount of dollars in your banks, or who utilized the services of X division of UBS' private banking group." Doing it that way, we created a showdown with the Swiss, whose economy in no small part depends on the attractiveness of their protective banking secrecy laws.

I'd have no issue with discrete requests made for records, and would expect Swiss compliance. But we didn't do that. Being the arrogant, lazy nation we are, we demanded they open volumes of books for us to allow the law enforcement agents of this country who hadn't done their job to go on a fishing expedition. Judges don't allow that sort of broad net discovery in criminal or civil actions here and the Swiss had every right to tell us to fuck off there. It's their sovereign territory, their bank, and the possibility of a bad press imperiling an important source of revenue to their country. That we don't like it, or think they protect criminals, is irrelevant. We don't make their laws.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 09-29-2009 at 12:20 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.