LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 929
0 members and 929 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-22-2010, 12:56 PM   #2203
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Re: It was the wrong thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
Weil and Gibson Dunn. Oops.

P.S. It was a "judgment as a matter of law" before the matter goes to the jury, similar to a "motion for directed verdict."
I'm sure district judges everywhere appreciate that they will now (if they weren't) get another mailed-in post-trial/pre-verdict motion that they have to consider and reject solely for the purposes of the Federal Circuit's willingness to review the damages verdict more carefully if such a motion is filed before, rather than after, damages are awarded by the jury.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.