LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 179
0 members and 179 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-29-2003, 05:06 PM   #4917
Bad_Rich_Chic
In my dreams ...
 
Bad_Rich_Chic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,955
If socking were a WMD ...

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
If this board was Iraq and socking was a WMD, there would be no socking here. At least none that any of the inspectors could discern.
Nonsense. If this board were Iraq and socking were a WMD ...

Thurgreed would insist that posters' socks had just as much value concealed as exposed, and therefore it didn't matter if they accepted the bribes and pressures of the community of GAs at large and fully disclosed them or not, since they would benefit either way. Therefore, we can safely assume that the socks exist, even though we can't see them. Sebby would retort "anyone who thinks that is stupid, any reasonable person with socks would just let their socks hang out there for everyone to see. The argument that people really run around concealing their socks so desperately is silly." Thurgreed would seek to retaliate by implying that Sebby could only make such assertions because of Sebby's wife, and would attempt to make Sebby's wife's socks public in an attempt to undermine Sebby's credibility. Of course, the GA public would be all over this, and everyone would seek to learn all they could about Sebby's wife's socks and otherwise verify them, so (they would piously argue) they could evaluate the seriousness of Thurgreed's having made them public.

edited for clarity, 'cause I'm unclear.
__________________
- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.

Last edited by Bad_Rich_Chic; 10-29-2003 at 05:11 PM..
Bad_Rich_Chic is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.