|
Re: MICHIGAN v. BRYANT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
Sittin' in a tree.
If the word "Rick" wasn't testimonial, why was it relevant and therefore admissible? I think the fact a prosecutor wanted the jury to hear is is pretty fuckin' strong evidence that it was testimonial. Whadda joke.
It looks like the Court has confused all of its law about the good faith/intentionality of law enforcement under the warrant requirement with the Sixth Amendment. Next we'll have coerced confessions admitted on the basis that officers were acting in good faith.
|
I enjoyed his dissent - http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-150.pdf
__________________
Boogers!
|
