Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
I've never read your book, but if it's not in there, you really should write up a list and description of all of your most hated lawyer tricks.
If you need help, I'd be happy to contribute to the one on gratuitous person attacks.
|
I can't not shoot the messenger with you. You're impervious to any point that isn't made with the most rote, linear use of language, and any point that asks one to think in the realm of businessman, as opposed to economist.
You couldn't even notice I was talking about multipliers in aggregate. I can't figure out for sure where you drug the public v. private argument from, but I can only conclude that, in your bizarrely narrowing view, the idea anyone would comment on them in total is just... well, Unpossible! "We must take them apart, sector by sector! Sebby has discussed them separately in the past, so I will use his point of months ago to suggest he's doing the same thing here, and Fucking Cazart! - I will then have an argument against him!"
Never mind that maybe I was asking you to think outside of your self-imposed rigid confines and run the argument to the next level. That I might assume a rational person would, in the absence of a dichotomy, conclude none was assumed! That I might have meant the temporariness of the economic impacts I was referencing addressed ALL economic impacts.
Fuck it.
