Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
But I have a very hard time with the argument that any use of the prosecutor's prerogative not:-) e to bring as case was required, or the failure to use it evidence of misconduct. You disagree with the prosecutor about the relative importance of the case, but that doesn't make him wrong.
|
Try rebring after mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct. Bonds and Clemens' cases are due to anal-retentive asshole attorneys with Napoleon, small-dick complexes upset that the jock again refused their now legally cloaked revengeful inquisitions. It took the time for two free meals for a jury to reject this case. They have more sense in their collective head than entire office of TTT graduates with a hard-on for lying on anon-consequential issue. Yet they probably think that Clinton should not have been impeached or disbarred.
LessinBerlin
