LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 109
0 members and 109 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2015, 04:45 PM   #1021
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: For Sebby

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Do I have to say I agree with the article? Seems a waste of effort. How couldn't I? I read it twice by the way, having also scanned it in the Times yesterday.

I decided to offer a thought I had after reading it. This seemed the more interesting thing to do.
Here's the problem with your post: "The shift toward hiring/renting/giving credit based on surface information is only increasing."

That sentence basically sums up the issue with your previous posts (remember, the "jumping off point" in your last post was your retort to why redlining wasn't really discrimination) that I was trying to address by citing this article.

I don't want you to say, "I agree with the article," because what's in the article just *is.*

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.