LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 220
0 members and 220 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-06-2015, 01:41 PM   #1077
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Re: It was HAL 9000!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
I think the article generally said people denied having intent, not that they didn't actually have intent.

Lots of people say there is not a discriminatory bone in their body, but then intentionally give preference to alumni of their own lily white school, to people who their own lily white friends recommend, to people who grew up in their icky white suburb or to other people who fit their own tribal characteristics. Hiring nothing but white people while denying discriminatory intent is a time-honored American tradition.

But interviewing people who are shocked at their own discriminatory actions is like asking the guy holding walking out of your house holding a jewel box if he is stealing it. "Stealing what? Oh, this? Just have to bring it to the shop and fix a blown gasket. I don't know how it found it's way into my hands. Is this yours? It looks like mine."
I didn't have intent. I was actually shocked and ashamed at the level of built-in racism I displayed when I actually started paying attention. Stuff like "I can't be racist; I dated the black girl (that's right, there was one) in my class, I was friends with three of the four black guys in my class and two of the three in the classes above and below."

Doesn't make me any less racist in action, but I do maintain there was no overt intent.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.