Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
You should read "Just Mercy."
But I don't see how this is responsive to my question. Are you saying that prosecutors who don't think they can get a conviction for all the wrong reasons even when he has tons of evidence should go ahead with the case because the defendant may be able to get the venue changed?
TM
|
What I was getting to is that if, because of governmental involvement, or particular notoriety, the defendant can't get a fair and impartial review, take it elsewhere. Do the same for a trial.
What I'm suggesting is that if there is a risk the prosecution will be less than impartial, take it our of their hands. I'm not saying it's a good solution, or even that it would work. Hence the tentative tone of my post.
