LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 160
0 members and 160 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2016, 09:30 PM   #1768
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group

Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Bob View Post
I'm with Icky - it's really amazing how often "it depends" is the correct answer.

Is Company B a party to the case with the protective order? Does the PO say anything about use of eyes only docs at depos?

In the past, I've either said something like "did you send an email to Sidd Finch about 2nd quarter 2014 widget pricing?" (after setting it up with general questions about whether B's CEO communicated with anyone), or went thru the PO process of removing the eyes only designation on multiple documents (so as not to tip my hand on the ones I really want to use).

Good luck.
A is a party, B not. B supplied A with products that infringe. Lots of B written documents. The protective order does not say I can. I was wondering if there was some general rule that i can show it to people who know its contents.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.