LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,680
0 members and 1,680 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2016, 11:31 AM   #421
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
Hillary was present at the meeting in which her Under Secretary (Kennedy) raised the issue of the civilian clothing for the Marines. She participated in the debate.

I am particularly troubled by the extent to which the attire debate and the State Department's clutching of pearls may have been influenced by the fact that if they went in uniform, the perception would be that it was a real military intervention that would indicate that the Middle East was not the sunshine and rainbows the administration wished to convey, given the proximity to the election. It wasn't an issue of the safety of the Marines.
Get over yourself. I'm sure there were a number of reasons why civilian clothing vs. fatigues was an issue, some of which rise to the level of how the country and the world classifies the incursion. And those are issues her department is responsible for addressing.

Secondly, from your answer, I'm not convinced Hillary was involved beyond (possibly) hearing the issue and you sure don't seem like you can assert that she was involved in a 4 hour debate about it and sending conflicting orders as if she was changing her mind over and over. And that's what you implied.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.