Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield  That's not right wing bullshit.  Her surrogates destroyed 30,000 emails.  You know civil litigation.  Imagine the spoliation arguments in a case where that happens.  The inference against the party destroying them would be enormous.
 If you've been in the position to have done something like this, you know - no order to do so is ever given from the top.  It's implied.  It's what occurs when you are engaged in an enterprise where the people who can get rid of paper trails understand the need to do so while preserving plausible deniability for the people at the top.
 | 
	
 The fact that you jump to the worst case scenario is all the evidence anyone needs to know that the constant refrain of Hillary's corruption has worked on you.  The simplest explanation is that she doesn't want to have every single email she wrote studied for the next 5 years and each nasty thing she said about the left, the right, Obama, the Pope, Putin, Cameron, Merkle, whoever released and held up for everyone to see.  And it seems reasonable to believe that she knew she'd be subject to this level of scrutiny based on her 30 years experience going through the right's same bullshit at every level.
TM