LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 117
0 members and 117 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-22-2016, 08:43 PM   #1207
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
But paying teacher's more is not an answer.
I disagree. On the other hand, I think HOW you pay teachers can be more important than what you pay them. We ought to be paying SOME teachers more.

We pay them in lock-step based on seniority because they are public employees and we learned a long time ago that public employment can easily be corrupted if you don't implement those kinds of protections. And the base for teachers salaries was set back in a time when most teachers were women and there was an assumption it was not just a second but a secondary income.

We ought to be negotiating very different deals for teachers than we have today.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.