LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 138
0 members and 138 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-28-2016, 11:20 AM   #2610
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Again, both of these things disproportionately advantage the relatively well off. The poor - and certainly not the uneducated working class - don't have student debt and can't get big credit card balances.

You're advocating forgiveness for your neighborhood.
On the contrary, the poor often have surprisingly high balances. In a past life, I purchased debt portfolios. I was shocked at how loose cc lending was prior to 2008, and though it did become more disciplined afterward, it's still quite liberal. It wasn't at all unusual to see people with $50k income demographics holding $20k in cc debt. Lenders do so well based on the enormous interest that the default risk is minimized. And that risk has been tamped post-crisis as credit cards are often the last line of liquidity for the poor.

I'm generally adverse to regulation, but you don't hear me arguing much about the CFPB. Predatory lending is up there with private prison lobbying. Of the many sins I've accrued, that portfolio work is probably what'd land me in hell were there an afterlife (right behind certain of the plaintiff's work, for which I claimed the Nuremberg Defense).
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 11-28-2016 at 11:22 AM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 PM.