LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,983
0 members and 2,983 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-29-2016, 05:39 PM   #2664
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Please. He's saying all issues regarding voter suppression are required to be vetted equally in a colorblind manner, and this was not done. There is no sane, logical, unbiased way to read what you have into what he wrote.
What?

I do not know how I could possibly make this any fucking clearer. There are no instances of voter suppression occurring w/r/t white people (except, as Ty pointed out, the one that was handled*). The whole point of the VRA is to police states that suppress minority voters. If the only instances of voter suppression occur in one direction, then how the fuck does what you just wrote make any sense at all?

TM

*Let me guess your response: But we don't know about all the voter suppression of white people because the non-colorblind DOJ didn't investigate all the instances of white voter suppression!

FOH.

eta: I find it fascinating that you don't understand that I was agreeing with him based on what he wrote.

Last edited by ThurgreedMarshall; 11-29-2016 at 05:42 PM..
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.